As the preeminent MPS consulting firm you probably wonder how this title made it onto Strategy Development’s blog. Does Strategy Development really think that MPS will die? The answer to that question is the same as the answer to a few others: Will CPP leasing die? Will digital products die? Will color output devices die? Of course the answer to all of these questions, including the death of MPS, is a resounding “No,” not in the foreseeable future.
So then why “The Death of MPS?” What I do expect to die are individuals (not physically just in discussion), companies, anybody, viewing MPS as some discreet business. I cannot wait to stop getting e-mails touting the latest show on MPS; the latest study on MPS; the latest definition of MPS; the latest MPS sliced bread.
Cost per page, or in the day cost-per-copy, was going to change the business forever; a business model shift and not simply a new approach to leasing. It did change the business in that it built in great switching cost and protected aftermarket. It also had a slight change on the business in the requirement to capture meters and the elimination of large aftermarket sales teams. But it was an evolutionary change and not a revolutionary change. Sure the software providers needed to catch up, but they did, and the dealer/reseller needed to transition their supply reps to meter collectors and supply shippers, and they did, but it wasn’t much of a blip on the screen with the benefit of hindsight.
Then digital was going to forever change the business. Remember the research firms saying, “if you don’t own the network you won’t sell copiers/printers?” A significant business model shift that would leave many copier companies in the dust and out of business: Well that never happened. Digital did have an effect that we are feeling now, printer and copiers go head-to-head, but it was a long change that provided a lot of opportunity to adapt. Owning the network never had an effect on acquiring output devices, and the dealer/reseller developed the skills to sell and maintain digital products and to leverage the professional services that could be sold with, or after, the installation of the device connected to the network.
Then color and production—take your choice: Dealers couldn’t afford to sell and maintain these devices. They were the bailiwick of the OEM with their hordes of cash and ability to deploy sophisticates sales professionals and support teams to support the products. Sorry, wrong again. Dealers adapted and successfully sold color and production, tweaking their business model as they went along.
And now MPS: Some would leave you to believe that MPS was some new and exciting space. I sold my first real MPS agreement in 2002—eight years ago—only we called it fleet management and it was inside of a facilities management (FM) agreement. To be fair our FM team was selling fleet management for years before that, I simply was involved in this transaction because it was a multi-million dollar contract and the customer wanted a full equipment refresh built into the agreement, with the equipment being refreshed over the multi-year agreement. In other words it had Balance Sheet risk so it needed executive engagement. I was also involved in numerous transactions in the enterprise space where the customer wanted to optimize and standardize their output fleet and use professional services, like advanced capture and routing, fax servers, variable data printing, web submission, and document management, to improve their workflow. Today you call these transactions MPS.
For most dealers/resellers MPS is a new go-to-market strategy and it does require changes in the business model, but those changes are becoming a lot clearer today. Early adapters dealt with remote monitoring software that was unpredictable at best. Today’s entrants find software that works well and improves every day. Early adapters worked with leading leasing companies to define contracts; today’s entrants benefit by having contracts that are well written for MPS. Early adapters had vision or faith, or maybe both, that MPS was a real revenue stream where they could make a profit. Today’s entrants have numerous examples of companies in the space growing rapidly and earning nice margins.
The success factors, from a high level perspective, of MPS are also clearly defined: Have a business plan, make an investment in the MPS business, use dedicated sales professionals, use a services led approach, employee quarterly business reviews, be hardware independent, and invest in sales, service and back office operations training. That’s not to say that companies aren’t adapting a MPS strategy at different times or only in portions. You have early and successful adapters, like FlexPrint, and you have many dealers/resellers who say they are in MPS because it is what they feel they need to say, but they really aren’t. The same was true of CPP, color, production, digital, and professional services. I remember Leslie in NYC (acquired by Danka) being the poster child for color back in the day.
We no longer talk about the risk of using a CPP model in our sales approach nor do we view it as a creative marketing approach. We no longer advertise that our products are digital or talk about the analog to digital transformation. We no longer look at production and color devices and wonder if we’ll ever be able to sell and support the devices. Think about this for less than a second: If you didn’t use CPP, didn’t sell digital devices, color, or production what would you be? Not a lot of debate needed as it is an easy answer, basically out of business.
An MPS contract can include imaging and printing devices, support and supply of those devices, software applications related to documents, and consulting services. What does that sound like to you? If you’re reading this blog, and not lost in cyberspace, my guess is it sound like your business? Am I on the mark? So the longer you take to really get into MPS the greater proportion of your customers that will be signing MPS agreements with a competitor. If you competitor is good at MPS it will only be a matter of a few quarters after they get into your account that you are totally displaced. Therefore, MPS becomes both your growth approach and your survival.
This post is really focused on the dealer /reseller. For the OEM MPS can have a significant effect on their business. If all of the dealers / resellers suddenly become hardware agnostic—they simply sell and support what is best for the end users—it could accelerate the winners and the losers in the OEM space. There is also the issue of compatible supplies and InfoTrends has done a good job of quantifying the possible effect on a OEMs revenue stream in this area. The bottom line is that day is coming so the OEMs need to develop a model that makes their products the best choice for deployment inside of an MPS agreement. Maybe we’ll make that the topic of a later post.
Showing posts with label InfoTrends. Show all posts
Showing posts with label InfoTrends. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Thoughts from the ELFA
I recently read an ELFA presentation (Equipment Leasing and Finance Association) titled, “As the drum turns….The World of used Copiers.” Can you picture 300 – 400 leasing company representatives in a large room listening to this stimulating presentation? The world of used copiers—where was I for this one!
IDC’s research was referenced throughout the presentation—and along with InfoTrends and Gartner—I consider IDC a reputable research firm. Clearly the point of the presentation was to highlight changes in the used copier space. That aspect of the presentation was eye opening for me simply from the perspective that used color MFDs from the same vintage as mono MFDs actually sell for less on the used market.
The presentation had numerous examples but I’ll simply take one that is representative: A Canon iR5570 with a list price of $17,100 had a “remarketer sale price” of $1,350, or 8% of the original equipment price (OEP) and a Canon iRC5870U, with a list price of $19,100 had a remarketer sale price of $300, 2% of OEP. With the lower lease approval rate driving increased rental of lease end devices I assume the remarketer sale price will continue to decrease, forcing leasing rates higher since residual value is part of the equation to determine lease rate.
Increasing lease rates won’t be any fun for those companies that still rely 100% on the “bigger better faster same price” model of moving your year on year aftermarket price increases over to the funding side of the lease to sell a new box and take care of the buyout, reducing your aftermarket revenue and generating a commission for a rep. But for those companies that still work on this zero sum game the good news is that according to IDC, as reported by the ELFA in this presentation, average unit sales prices (AUSP) have dropped precipitously. That drop will allow you to continue to fund the buyout of the swap and maintain the “bigger better faster new price” suicide march [not the point of this post but think about it….you are selling a MFD at a lower price than you did four years earlier, reducing the aftermarket rate to below what the current placement started at four years earlier (and far below the current rate with three years of compounded increases) and probably paying your sales rep the same amount as you did four years ago to place the other unit since it probably has about the same amount of “GP” in the deal….how’s that work financially?).
Just how big is that AUSP decrease? Let’s first talk about mono-connected boxes and use the seven year look that ELFA used in their analysis; this is an absolute seven year decrease and not a compounded annual decrease—in other words, it is the decrease from seven years back until 2009. Segment 2 (43%), segment 3 (30%), segment 4 (24%), segment 5 (27%) and segment 6 (12%). Even scarier was color, using the same methodology, segment 1 (49%), segment 2 (54%), segment 3 (55%), segment 4 (25%) and segment 5 (61%).
Strategy Development has spoken about using environmental information in your planning and in previous posts on this blog we have already highlighted some of the year on year unit placement decreases. Now you have information on unit placement decreases, there is indication that lease rates will rise (interest rates can’t stay at zero forever and used equipment pricing isn’t holding), and AUSP is decreasing. Juxtapose those issues against more and more non-contract devices moving to contracts (MPS) and your ability to reduce your general and administrative expense and increase your service margins and you have some great environmental issues on which to build a solid business plan.
We will be running our BTA Business Planning Workshop in October in the Miami area—hope to see you there so that you can seize the future!
IDC’s research was referenced throughout the presentation—and along with InfoTrends and Gartner—I consider IDC a reputable research firm. Clearly the point of the presentation was to highlight changes in the used copier space. That aspect of the presentation was eye opening for me simply from the perspective that used color MFDs from the same vintage as mono MFDs actually sell for less on the used market.
The presentation had numerous examples but I’ll simply take one that is representative: A Canon iR5570 with a list price of $17,100 had a “remarketer sale price” of $1,350, or 8% of the original equipment price (OEP) and a Canon iRC5870U, with a list price of $19,100 had a remarketer sale price of $300, 2% of OEP. With the lower lease approval rate driving increased rental of lease end devices I assume the remarketer sale price will continue to decrease, forcing leasing rates higher since residual value is part of the equation to determine lease rate.
Increasing lease rates won’t be any fun for those companies that still rely 100% on the “bigger better faster same price” model of moving your year on year aftermarket price increases over to the funding side of the lease to sell a new box and take care of the buyout, reducing your aftermarket revenue and generating a commission for a rep. But for those companies that still work on this zero sum game the good news is that according to IDC, as reported by the ELFA in this presentation, average unit sales prices (AUSP) have dropped precipitously. That drop will allow you to continue to fund the buyout of the swap and maintain the “bigger better faster new price” suicide march [not the point of this post but think about it….you are selling a MFD at a lower price than you did four years earlier, reducing the aftermarket rate to below what the current placement started at four years earlier (and far below the current rate with three years of compounded increases) and probably paying your sales rep the same amount as you did four years ago to place the other unit since it probably has about the same amount of “GP” in the deal….how’s that work financially?).
Just how big is that AUSP decrease? Let’s first talk about mono-connected boxes and use the seven year look that ELFA used in their analysis; this is an absolute seven year decrease and not a compounded annual decrease—in other words, it is the decrease from seven years back until 2009. Segment 2 (43%), segment 3 (30%), segment 4 (24%), segment 5 (27%) and segment 6 (12%). Even scarier was color, using the same methodology, segment 1 (49%), segment 2 (54%), segment 3 (55%), segment 4 (25%) and segment 5 (61%).
Strategy Development has spoken about using environmental information in your planning and in previous posts on this blog we have already highlighted some of the year on year unit placement decreases. Now you have information on unit placement decreases, there is indication that lease rates will rise (interest rates can’t stay at zero forever and used equipment pricing isn’t holding), and AUSP is decreasing. Juxtapose those issues against more and more non-contract devices moving to contracts (MPS) and your ability to reduce your general and administrative expense and increase your service margins and you have some great environmental issues on which to build a solid business plan.
We will be running our BTA Business Planning Workshop in October in the Miami area—hope to see you there so that you can seize the future!
Thursday, March 18, 2010
ITEX 2010—What a Great Event
Wow, ITEX was phenomenal this year. For those of you that attended, and there were many, I know you agree because I have heard the feedback. What makes ITEX such a great show? To me the number one attribute of ITEX is the networking opportunity; most of the industry decision makers attend the show. When I say decision makers I mean dealer/reseller principals and senior management. Company owners and senior management have a unique perspective on the industry and having the opportunity to speak with thousands of this group provides untold benefits to all, including companies like mine in the consulting field.
The second benefit of ITEX is the education. Unlike many shows, where the sponsors get all of the speaking spots (Nothing against listening to a software or hardware vendor giving their perspective on the industry but after all, won’t the vendors pay you to listen to them), ITEX vets the presenters and chooses those that bring benefit to the dealer/reseller community. For less than $100, the entry fee, attendees get to choose from dozens of educational tracks on all aspects of the business. SD has presented for years and this was the first year we had a booth at the show, and we were asked to speak months before we were asked to consider exhibiting.
If I had to critique the show I will say that I was disappointed with the “Hybrid” moniker. Every time I hear hybrid I think of a car or fuel option. It seems to be the most over used word in the English language these days. I can’t pick up a newspaper or magazine without reading about some company, industry, or option presenting themselves as hybrids. I think it supplanted “solution” as the most ubiquitous word in the business press. ITEX is more than the hybrid dealer, covering education on all aspects of running a successful company. That was reflected in the educational options offered at ITEX.
Strategy Development consultants presented in many areas of the business and each of our classes had approximately 200 participants. David Ramos presented on self managed teams and opportunities in the color space. Ed Carroll presented on professional service. Mike Woodard presented on creating the ideal service and IT team as well as managing the base to control service cost. And I (Tom Callinan) presented on repositioning your business model, which was essentially business planning.
So if you look at the educational offerings presented by Strategy Development we covered sales management, color opportunities, professional services, service operations, and business planning. And, there were dozens of other well (albeit the SD seminars were sold out…) received educational offerings.
If you missed ITEX you missed a great event, and we missed you! We’ll be at the BTA Northeast and Southeast events as well as InfoTrends Solution Summit 2010 in Chicago. Like ITEX, all of these events provide a great ROI. The BTA events have solid education and networking opportunity, on a regional level, and InfoTrends provides enough research to make the trip well worth the effort. If you cannot make these great events we hope to see you next year at ITEX 2011 in DC.
The second benefit of ITEX is the education. Unlike many shows, where the sponsors get all of the speaking spots (Nothing against listening to a software or hardware vendor giving their perspective on the industry but after all, won’t the vendors pay you to listen to them), ITEX vets the presenters and chooses those that bring benefit to the dealer/reseller community. For less than $100, the entry fee, attendees get to choose from dozens of educational tracks on all aspects of the business. SD has presented for years and this was the first year we had a booth at the show, and we were asked to speak months before we were asked to consider exhibiting.
If I had to critique the show I will say that I was disappointed with the “Hybrid” moniker. Every time I hear hybrid I think of a car or fuel option. It seems to be the most over used word in the English language these days. I can’t pick up a newspaper or magazine without reading about some company, industry, or option presenting themselves as hybrids. I think it supplanted “solution” as the most ubiquitous word in the business press. ITEX is more than the hybrid dealer, covering education on all aspects of running a successful company. That was reflected in the educational options offered at ITEX.
Strategy Development consultants presented in many areas of the business and each of our classes had approximately 200 participants. David Ramos presented on self managed teams and opportunities in the color space. Ed Carroll presented on professional service. Mike Woodard presented on creating the ideal service and IT team as well as managing the base to control service cost. And I (Tom Callinan) presented on repositioning your business model, which was essentially business planning.
So if you look at the educational offerings presented by Strategy Development we covered sales management, color opportunities, professional services, service operations, and business planning. And, there were dozens of other well (albeit the SD seminars were sold out…) received educational offerings.
If you missed ITEX you missed a great event, and we missed you! We’ll be at the BTA Northeast and Southeast events as well as InfoTrends Solution Summit 2010 in Chicago. Like ITEX, all of these events provide a great ROI. The BTA events have solid education and networking opportunity, on a regional level, and InfoTrends provides enough research to make the trip well worth the effort. If you cannot make these great events we hope to see you next year at ITEX 2011 in DC.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
What is MPS?
Yesterday, Document Solutions Daily, a great publication available by subscription, had a link to a blog post titled “MPS Isn’t Just for the Big Boys.” Although the post details what can be described as an admirable job by a sales person to place a MFD, and that sales person works for a well known and respected copier company—so this commentary isn’t directed at either the sales person or the employer—does the post really describe an MPS agreement?
I ask the question for two reasons. First to define the MPS space, because if selling one MFD to replace an older MFD and some printers is MPS we may as well simply pull out the market size stats that have been put forth by Info Trends, Gartner, and IDC for the last few decades and change the title at the top from “copier and printer market” to “MPS Market.” It seems like anything with MPS on it sells so why not? Second is focus, the MPS space is a high growth high profit business today so should dealers / resellers really be looking at single placements of MFDs as an MPS opportunity?
Don’t get me wrong—I want sales professionals that can solve problems to get me new customers and retain those customers. If I still owned a copier dealership I would want them to sell copiers and I would want reps with problem solving skills to sell MPS. But I would clearly define my MPS space so I am not spending time in areas with little to no ROI.
Few companies with 250 – 1,000 knowledge employees are in MPS contracts today so why deploy resources at companies with fewer than 10 employees? Moreover, why focus on the hardware placement when the profits are in the aftermarket? We shouldn’t be measuring MPS by selling and MFD….we should be measuring MPS by how much recurring revenue it brings to our business. Strategy Development has been encouraging traditional copier dealers to get away from measuring sales success by hardware sales and to start measuring sales success by aftermarket growth. If you own the contract on the equipment you will sell the equipment.
So congratulations to that sales professional and the company mentioned in the blog—it appears as if you helped that customer solve a business problem with the correct MFD. But I would encourage companies to take a rifle approach to MPS and focus to the sweet spot, companies with 250 – 1,000 knowledge worker employees. Once that market is saturated with MPS contracts you can work your way down the food chain if you find it necessary and profitable. Don’t lose focus just yet!
I ask the question for two reasons. First to define the MPS space, because if selling one MFD to replace an older MFD and some printers is MPS we may as well simply pull out the market size stats that have been put forth by Info Trends, Gartner, and IDC for the last few decades and change the title at the top from “copier and printer market” to “MPS Market.” It seems like anything with MPS on it sells so why not? Second is focus, the MPS space is a high growth high profit business today so should dealers / resellers really be looking at single placements of MFDs as an MPS opportunity?
Don’t get me wrong—I want sales professionals that can solve problems to get me new customers and retain those customers. If I still owned a copier dealership I would want them to sell copiers and I would want reps with problem solving skills to sell MPS. But I would clearly define my MPS space so I am not spending time in areas with little to no ROI.
Few companies with 250 – 1,000 knowledge employees are in MPS contracts today so why deploy resources at companies with fewer than 10 employees? Moreover, why focus on the hardware placement when the profits are in the aftermarket? We shouldn’t be measuring MPS by selling and MFD….we should be measuring MPS by how much recurring revenue it brings to our business. Strategy Development has been encouraging traditional copier dealers to get away from measuring sales success by hardware sales and to start measuring sales success by aftermarket growth. If you own the contract on the equipment you will sell the equipment.
So congratulations to that sales professional and the company mentioned in the blog—it appears as if you helped that customer solve a business problem with the correct MFD. But I would encourage companies to take a rifle approach to MPS and focus to the sweet spot, companies with 250 – 1,000 knowledge worker employees. Once that market is saturated with MPS contracts you can work your way down the food chain if you find it necessary and profitable. Don’t lose focus just yet!
Monday, January 4, 2010
Trade Shows: Are they worth the time
I am frequently asked the by clients “Should I attend (fill in the blank) show / conference?” I tend to answer the question with another question, “What are you looking to get out of the event?” Your answer to that question will then lead to some research to determine if the event is worth the investment in entrance fee, travel expense, and more importantly, your time.
There are many trade shows out there and a new one seems to pop-up every other year. They may be disguised as conferences or some other educations sounding event but when you look under the covers most are simply trade shows. Let’s explore some of the goals of a trade show:
Networking: An important aspect of business and one that requires focus. Many dealers belong to industry groups such as BPCA, CDA, SDG, or others and get to see their fellow group members at the events held by these groups. The networking aspect is just one of the many reasons why we recommend that our clients belong to an industry peer group. You also have the manufacturer dealer meetings held every 18 – 24 months. The problem with both of these types of events is that they are closed—you need to be a member of the peer group or you need to be a dealer for the manufacturer.
To network with dealers outside of this group you need an open forum. Two that accomplish this goal are the BTA regional events and ITEX. As by far the largest advocacy group for the copier / MPS industry, the BTA provides many benefits to the dealer / reseller community. One of those many benefits are the regional events they hold every year. I have participated in events in the Northeast and Southeast and they had drawn a large quantity of regional dealers and they are easy to get to, not requiring extra time for travel. I strongly recommend membership in the BTA and attendance at their events.
ITEX is the other forum that provides for networking, but in this case on a national basis. Las Vegas is a destination city and airfare and hotels are relatively inexpensive. You have great restaurants, entertainment, and oh yea, gambling. One of the largest benefits ITEX provides is the networking.
Education: Two warnings when it comes to education. First and foremost, if the event sponsors have most of the speaking spots you are wasting your time. One thinly veiled secret of the conference set is that some events are simply designed to generate revenue for the event coordinator and not designed to actually provide any value to the participants. Want to provide the keynote address? Become the platinum sponsor. Want to provide the day one closing address? Buy the gold sponsorship. Just align the sponsorship hierarchy with the relative status of the speaking spot and I think you will find perfect alignment. When you pay $10,000 to $20,000 to be the sponsor you talk about what you believe is a legitimate subject—the event coordinator doesn’t have a lot of influence after they take your check.
Do you really need to pay to see a vendor speak? It is my experience that the vendor will gladly pay for you to visit their office for the presentation and maybe even buy you a nice dinner or round of golf. Heck, lately some have even been flying dealers to their offices in Asia—on their dime.
And if you gave it some thought do you think that software vendor, toner recharge sales person or parts sales person really knows how to instruct you on launching an MPS program? Improve your sales effectiveness? Improve service margins? How about that MFP manufacturer trying to sell you that they don’t necessarily want you to sell their hardware? Why on earth would you pay to have these vendors that would either pay you for the opportunity to meet or who don’t have competency in the subject matter to speak to you…or should I be more straight forward and ask why pay for a sales pitch?
The second warning is on the concept of education at a trade show or conference. Most of the time the person giving the “training” is not being paid to instruct (in the sponsorship scenario they are actually paying for their opportunity to “train” you), but more than likely considers the speaking engagement an opportunity to give a sales pitch on their program. The degree of “pitch” vs training varies. I am sure we have all sat through the training program where we received 5 minutes of 80,000 foot theory and 55 minutes of program pitch, some disguised and some not so disguised. At other times we did get 45 – 50 minutes of 5,000 foot information and 10 – 15 minutes of pitch. The former is a complete waste of time and the latter provides you an opportunity to determine if the speaker can help your organization on a consulting or training basis.
The point is that you can learn at some of the conferences where the sponsors don’t get the majority of the speaking slots, but don’t expect to learn too much and choose the seminars you attend carefully. Let’s be realistic, do you think that a person that makes a living selling their knowledge is going to provide it to you for free, and do that in one hour?
What should you look to avoid? Preconference days that are completely paid for by sponsors and all of the speaking slots are taken by sponsors. These usually focus on the hot topic of the day like MPS or service improvement. Ironically, even though the sponsors paid to speak at these events they usually cost you additional money to attend—so you are paying to get a sales pitch.
The other area to avoid is conferences designed strictly to generate revenue for the show producer. What do they look like? A subject matter conference (always the hot topic of the day as that is the only topic anybody would be lured into paying for without much investigation) where all of the sponsors have speaking engagements. Whereas the add on day to the conference usually only costs an additional $99 - $150, effectively doubling the cost of the conference, it isn’t unusual for these total rip-off subject matter conferences to cost $795 - $995. Some go as far as having an add on day as a front runner to their totally sponsored conference.
If you really want education you need to pay for it and you should select the education topic you require. The good conference, like the main ITEX show or BTA regional events, may give you exposure to different speakers to help you make your assessment but once you believe you found a good trainer go to the specific workshop they offer on the subject and don’t attend any overpriced conferences hoping to get trained. You’ll only get trained if the trainer is getting compensated for their knowledge. The BTA offers some great programs.
Product information: If you want to compare and contrast products you have three choices, two of them logical. The first, illogical approach is to visit each company (illogical because of cost and time). The second is a series of webinars. The third is got to the main ITEX show and have appointments scheduled with each of the vendors to review their products.
Research: I find InfoTrends conference to be a great research opportunity. This isn’t the traditional educational event but it is one of the most educational events you can attend. Want to know what is going to happen with unit placements? You’ll learn it at the infoTrends conference. Want to know about print volume trends and where documents are being printed? You’ll learn it at the infoTrends conference. Basically, if you want to get into the details of the industry, copier or MPS, attend this conference.
You might want to research a new area—document archival for instance. There are trade shows for these areas such as AIIM. Search out the trade shows but use the information you have above to vet the show. If it is comprised totally of talking heads from the sponsors that are going to tell you how to do something they never did avoid the event.
The bottom line—there are a few shows that are worth the money if they fit into your goals but evaluate what your goals are against the agenda of the show.
There are many trade shows out there and a new one seems to pop-up every other year. They may be disguised as conferences or some other educations sounding event but when you look under the covers most are simply trade shows. Let’s explore some of the goals of a trade show:
Networking: An important aspect of business and one that requires focus. Many dealers belong to industry groups such as BPCA, CDA, SDG, or others and get to see their fellow group members at the events held by these groups. The networking aspect is just one of the many reasons why we recommend that our clients belong to an industry peer group. You also have the manufacturer dealer meetings held every 18 – 24 months. The problem with both of these types of events is that they are closed—you need to be a member of the peer group or you need to be a dealer for the manufacturer.
To network with dealers outside of this group you need an open forum. Two that accomplish this goal are the BTA regional events and ITEX. As by far the largest advocacy group for the copier / MPS industry, the BTA provides many benefits to the dealer / reseller community. One of those many benefits are the regional events they hold every year. I have participated in events in the Northeast and Southeast and they had drawn a large quantity of regional dealers and they are easy to get to, not requiring extra time for travel. I strongly recommend membership in the BTA and attendance at their events.
ITEX is the other forum that provides for networking, but in this case on a national basis. Las Vegas is a destination city and airfare and hotels are relatively inexpensive. You have great restaurants, entertainment, and oh yea, gambling. One of the largest benefits ITEX provides is the networking.
Education: Two warnings when it comes to education. First and foremost, if the event sponsors have most of the speaking spots you are wasting your time. One thinly veiled secret of the conference set is that some events are simply designed to generate revenue for the event coordinator and not designed to actually provide any value to the participants. Want to provide the keynote address? Become the platinum sponsor. Want to provide the day one closing address? Buy the gold sponsorship. Just align the sponsorship hierarchy with the relative status of the speaking spot and I think you will find perfect alignment. When you pay $10,000 to $20,000 to be the sponsor you talk about what you believe is a legitimate subject—the event coordinator doesn’t have a lot of influence after they take your check.
Do you really need to pay to see a vendor speak? It is my experience that the vendor will gladly pay for you to visit their office for the presentation and maybe even buy you a nice dinner or round of golf. Heck, lately some have even been flying dealers to their offices in Asia—on their dime.
And if you gave it some thought do you think that software vendor, toner recharge sales person or parts sales person really knows how to instruct you on launching an MPS program? Improve your sales effectiveness? Improve service margins? How about that MFP manufacturer trying to sell you that they don’t necessarily want you to sell their hardware? Why on earth would you pay to have these vendors that would either pay you for the opportunity to meet or who don’t have competency in the subject matter to speak to you…or should I be more straight forward and ask why pay for a sales pitch?
The second warning is on the concept of education at a trade show or conference. Most of the time the person giving the “training” is not being paid to instruct (in the sponsorship scenario they are actually paying for their opportunity to “train” you), but more than likely considers the speaking engagement an opportunity to give a sales pitch on their program. The degree of “pitch” vs training varies. I am sure we have all sat through the training program where we received 5 minutes of 80,000 foot theory and 55 minutes of program pitch, some disguised and some not so disguised. At other times we did get 45 – 50 minutes of 5,000 foot information and 10 – 15 minutes of pitch. The former is a complete waste of time and the latter provides you an opportunity to determine if the speaker can help your organization on a consulting or training basis.
The point is that you can learn at some of the conferences where the sponsors don’t get the majority of the speaking slots, but don’t expect to learn too much and choose the seminars you attend carefully. Let’s be realistic, do you think that a person that makes a living selling their knowledge is going to provide it to you for free, and do that in one hour?
What should you look to avoid? Preconference days that are completely paid for by sponsors and all of the speaking slots are taken by sponsors. These usually focus on the hot topic of the day like MPS or service improvement. Ironically, even though the sponsors paid to speak at these events they usually cost you additional money to attend—so you are paying to get a sales pitch.
The other area to avoid is conferences designed strictly to generate revenue for the show producer. What do they look like? A subject matter conference (always the hot topic of the day as that is the only topic anybody would be lured into paying for without much investigation) where all of the sponsors have speaking engagements. Whereas the add on day to the conference usually only costs an additional $99 - $150, effectively doubling the cost of the conference, it isn’t unusual for these total rip-off subject matter conferences to cost $795 - $995. Some go as far as having an add on day as a front runner to their totally sponsored conference.
If you really want education you need to pay for it and you should select the education topic you require. The good conference, like the main ITEX show or BTA regional events, may give you exposure to different speakers to help you make your assessment but once you believe you found a good trainer go to the specific workshop they offer on the subject and don’t attend any overpriced conferences hoping to get trained. You’ll only get trained if the trainer is getting compensated for their knowledge. The BTA offers some great programs.
Product information: If you want to compare and contrast products you have three choices, two of them logical. The first, illogical approach is to visit each company (illogical because of cost and time). The second is a series of webinars. The third is got to the main ITEX show and have appointments scheduled with each of the vendors to review their products.
Research: I find InfoTrends conference to be a great research opportunity. This isn’t the traditional educational event but it is one of the most educational events you can attend. Want to know what is going to happen with unit placements? You’ll learn it at the infoTrends conference. Want to know about print volume trends and where documents are being printed? You’ll learn it at the infoTrends conference. Basically, if you want to get into the details of the industry, copier or MPS, attend this conference.
You might want to research a new area—document archival for instance. There are trade shows for these areas such as AIIM. Search out the trade shows but use the information you have above to vet the show. If it is comprised totally of talking heads from the sponsors that are going to tell you how to do something they never did avoid the event.
The bottom line—there are a few shows that are worth the money if they fit into your goals but evaluate what your goals are against the agenda of the show.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
InfoTrends and Strategy Development Announce Development of Managed Print Services e-Learning Program
InfoTrends, the leading worldwide consulting firm for the digital imaging and document solutions industry, and Strategy Development, a management consultant and advanced sales training firm, announced the development of a new e-learning portal focused on Managed Print Services (MPS) Sales Training. The Web-based training program is designed to educate sales reps, sales management and principals on the requirements for a successful MPS strategy and sales execution plan around Managed Print Services. The portal offers a self-paced curriculum with guided audio and engaging interactive exercises that are available 24 hours a day - at an affordable price.
http://www.capv.com/public/Content/Press/2009/08.27.2009.2.html
We have a great training program in partnership with the BTA (www.bta.org) and we believe that classroom training provides many benefits, not the least of which is the questioning, interaction with other students, and ability to work on real world scenarios in breakout groups. Nevertheless, we realize that there are situations where eLearning is a better option. It is a great supplement for new hires after the manager or initial sales specialist attends the more intense BTA classroom training. It is also a great approach as a refresher. Finally, it is a solid option for those that want to keep expenses low, eliminating the need for travel.
http://www.capv.com/public/Content/Press/2009/08.27.2009.2.html
We have a great training program in partnership with the BTA (www.bta.org) and we believe that classroom training provides many benefits, not the least of which is the questioning, interaction with other students, and ability to work on real world scenarios in breakout groups. Nevertheless, we realize that there are situations where eLearning is a better option. It is a great supplement for new hires after the manager or initial sales specialist attends the more intense BTA classroom training. It is also a great approach as a refresher. Finally, it is a solid option for those that want to keep expenses low, eliminating the need for travel.
InfoTrends is the leading research firm in the imaging space, to include MPS. The Strategy Development Team is excited to enter this strategic alliance; we know InfoTrends research will only help to improve our industry leading sales training.
For information on the MPS Sales eLearning Training follow the link above or contact Tom Callinan: callinan@strategydevelopment.org
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Xerox Joins as Gold Sponsor for the Solutions Summit and Office Document Strategy Conference
(Weymouth, MA) June 18, 2009…. InfoTrends, the leading worldwide consulting firm for the digital imaging and document solutions industry, announced today that Xerox, a leading document management technology and services enterprise, has signed as a Gold Sponsor for their upcoming Solutions Summit and Office Document Strategy (ODS) Conference. The inaugural Solutions Summit will take place September 29-30, 2009, and the Office Document Strategy Conference will follow immediately September 30 – October 1, 2009. Both events will be hosted at the Hyatt Harborside, in Boston, Massachusetts.
http://www.infotrends.com/main/public/Content/Press/2009/06.18.2009.2.html
http://www.infotrends.com/main/public/Content/Press/2009/06.18.2009.2.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
