Many commentators in the MPS space like to talk about the 30% savings companies receive through an MPS agreement. I guess it helps them sell research, advance the theory of displacing printers with departmental MFDs, or helps the weak sales person generate some commission and retain his (her) job for a period.
But I have to ask a simple question, what is the rational to deliberately taking 30% of the revenue out of our industry? Overcapacity and technological improvements are already creating year on year decreases in hardware and aftermarket pricing and A4 is replacing A3 at a lower unit selling price. Those environmental changes should easily drive 10% of revenue per year out of our industry. Over the last two years units sales have decrease by more than 30%; they are gone and probably will never come back. Now we are all going to join in a concerted effort to drive an additional 30% of revenue out of the imaging space? Let’s all go to the jungle and drink some Jim Jones juice!
You can read my blog post from September titled: MPS: Growth Strategy or Harbinger of a Smaller Pie on the topic that MPS is not new revenue, simply a revenue shift from transactional to contractual. We are not generating new industry revenue with MPS; different players are capturing the revenue, which is good for those MPS providers in the short term.
As the industry leading MPS consulting firm we have been advocating for companies to adopt an MPS strategy for the past four years. Nevertheless, when you do launch your MPS strategy there is no reason to lead with a value proposition of saving a company 30%. Managing copiers, printers, scanners, and fax units is not a core competency for most companies; it is a nuisance area. Tying up valuable IT employees to remove misfeeds, install maintenance kits, or replace feed tires irritates CIO’s and IT directors who do not have enough resources to devote to their more mission critical projects like business intelligence, security, virtualization, and unified communications. Therein lies the value proposition—you build a business case for outsourcing.
I led a $225 million outsourcing business and that was simply the services revenue; there was an additional $60 million or so in equipment sold into the facilities management (FM) accounts. A portion of that $225 M was “fleet management” agreements. There are industry commentators who want to tell you MPS is not FM, but curiously those commentators have no FM background so how could they possibly make that statement? We didn’t sell outsourcing by telling companies we would save them money. At times it cost more money to outsource but the customer outsourced because we took away areas of their business that were not core competencies: Areas that distracted them from their business. Nuisance areas like imaging and printer fleets to most companies.
There were many FM agreements that included “gain share,” where working with the customer we drove efficiencies that resulted in lower cost that we shared with the customer. But the key there is the phrase “working with the customer.” You can do the same with an MPS agreement. Strategy Development’s three phases of MPS are manage, optimize and improve. Manage comes first followed by optimize and improve. Working with the customer—after you are generating revenue from an MPS agreement (manage)—you can help your customer make a decision on the lowest TCO device for each location that will provide the required functionality. This is where the cost savings come from, although reaching 30% is a stretch.
Why does Strategy Development have what appears to be a significantly different take than many industry commentators? For one, we are on the front lines every single day working on MPS transactions with our clients; and, we are fortunate to have the most successful MPS companies in the country as our clients. So we know what is happening out there and our client’s are not saving their customers 30% to get them to sign a contract. Our clients are building business cases that support an outsourced agreement with their customers.
Second, we don’t recommend what we would categorize as “scams” for selling MPS agreements. A relationship started on a lie cannot end well. Coverage area is, in the vast majority of the situations a scam; I will add that it is an easily exposed scam as more and more companies enter the MPS space. So “saving 30%” with a coverage area scam is no more a real savings than the consistent 16% returns investors thought they were getting with Bernie Madoff were wealth creation.
Next, we aren’t trying to sell you research and we aren’t consulting for end user companies. If there is a business out there that is trying to sell you something, be it research, training, a trade show, or newsletters and at the same time they are out telling end user companies that they can drive down their spend with you by 30% I recommend you cut off their nutrition—avoid them. When that business can’t survive because the industry cut them off maybe they’ll stop selling sensationalism and start selling reality.
Lastly, we aren’t a manufacturer trying to keep their factories churning out boxes and the trailing supplies and parts in an ever decreasing space that already has significant over capacity. We aren’t telling you go out there and replace all of their “Brand A” printers with “Our brand” printers or MFDs. We aren’t suggesting that you turn your sales force into change management consultants. That is a really tough sell that will be embraced by a small segment of the business population. Let’s thank God for that because if everybody out there reduces their device count by 60% or 70% we had better find something else to sell…..and fast!
Get into MPS but make certain you truly understand the MPS space so that you maximize revenue and margins. Because of the revenue shift described in the aforementioned blog post it can be a significant revenue driver. But the opportunity to capture significant new revenue combined with the 30% decline in MFD unit sales, which is really hurting the core copier business, has brought out every snake oil salesman in the land with the latest “elixir” for an MPS program. Choose wisely as any further delay in launching a successful program will be critical. Once those prospects are another company’s customers they will be locked into contracts that will be difficult to change.
If you want the best sales, back office operations, and service training the industry has to offer check out the BTA MPS Sales and BTA MPS Ops and Service Workshops at www.bta.org
This blog is maintained by Strategy Development to provide information to the imaging industry
