I realize that we are in a poor economy and that revenue is one measurement you always want to focus on, but cutting your prices is a death spiral. And don’t give me the cash flow reason either: the cash flow statement starts with the entry for net income. Lower prices results in lower margin, which results in lower net income—all else equal.
There are a lot of reasons for the death spiral comment. One is the cultural change you will instill in your sales force. If you have spent the last decade developing the team to sell value and fight for profit using enablers such as advanced capture, document routing, or variable data , and then send the message “get the deal at all cost,” your decade of work has evaporated in six words.
Once you get your sales force accustomed to selling on price how hard will it be to switch them back to value when we exit this economic trough? I would tell you it is next to impossible.
At the company I worked at prior to Strategy Development the CEO rolled out a new pricing and compensation structure for the sales force. Since I ran the largest business unit, and the only one gaining market share, I had my finance team run some Monte Carlo Modeling on the plan to see how it was going to affect our revenue and profit. The modeling demonstrated that GP would decline by 300 to 400 basis points and, depending on the mix of business, could actually increase compensation: Lower GP with higher compensation, about the ugliest of scenarios.
The CEO and I had what I’ll term as, robust discussion on the program (I always took delivering my results seriously). After this robust discussion we came to the conclusion that we had two distinct philosophies on strategy, and I left. Since it was a public company I could follow the results. The next quarter equipment GP decreased year over year by 430 basis points and the Wall Street Analyst annihilated the CEO on the earnings call. Even though it was a topic of discussion every quarter thereafter, the GP never recovered. That company spun out until it was ultimately acquired at what looked like a bargain, a significant discount, relative to other public companies acquired in the space.
The point is not that the modeling my team produced was accurate—who cares because I failed in delivering the message so that it would be heard—but that even with extreme focus and three years of opportunity that company could never get their margins back up. Don’t cut your prices!
So what actions should you take? Make well planned and strategic investments in sales and fund those investments by optimizing your service operations and your back office operations. Exiting the current economic trough in a position of strength is one big reason to focus on these two areas but another looming issue is that your new competitors—the VARs and print management companies stealthily entering your space—have G&A in the mid to high single digits. Most BTA channel companies have G&A in the high teens to low twenty percent area. Set your five year plan now to get G&A to less than 10% and to maximize service returns.
The next couple of entries will focus on how to accomplish these goals.